Which small tree for sandy soil with clay beneath?

in Plants
We have a large strip of gravel outside the front of our house, which we can't plant in because next door's cat digs, defecates and urinates all over it when planted (which is why we replaced it with gravel). Was planning a rock garden, but it will destroy that so have settled on planting a single tree. The ground is pretty inhospitable for most plants, as being a new build it has been backfilled with building rubble, large rocks and sand, then the natural earth beneath is thick clay.
Which small trees would cope in these conditions? The ground isn't severely waterlogged but doesn't drain freely, and the majority of other houses on the estate all have the small palm-looking plants (cordyline?) which seem to thrive in this type of ground, but I'm not a fan at all. Recommendations would be welcome, bonus if they could be planted at this time of year too. Looking for something that is going to stay small, probably no taller than about 4-5ft. Thanks in advance!
Which small trees would cope in these conditions? The ground isn't severely waterlogged but doesn't drain freely, and the majority of other houses on the estate all have the small palm-looking plants (cordyline?) which seem to thrive in this type of ground, but I'm not a fan at all. Recommendations would be welcome, bonus if they could be planted at this time of year too. Looking for something that is going to stay small, probably no taller than about 4-5ft. Thanks in advance!
0
Posts
Add a water scarecrow [if you don't get frosts] or a couple of those sonic devices as well. Otherwise you'll go mad trying to keep the r*ddy thing away, and even then, you'll have to be vigilant. I spent half an hour yesterday lifting at least ten piles from the front garden [including the grass] because of the persistent offender here.
If you know it's from next door, I'd be inclined to pick it up and return it to them....
It's a very contentious subject.
I live in west central Scotland - not where that photo is...
Maybe better to widen your search to include shrubs.
Is it possible to add a pic showing the area you are talking about.
so that we can see how big the space is in relation to the house, pavement, path, drive etc.
I agree with Fairygirls comments above.
I would dig down and remove all the builders rubble and rubbish.
I think you're spot on with trying to improve the ground. Still don't think it would be a good area for most trees though because the clay beneath is so thick and compacted and I won't be able to remove much. Any ideas on hardy trees that look pleasant would be great
It looks wonderful...super brickwork.
But that is a tiny area...no room for a 4-5ft tree or shrub.
Far to near to your house for a tree.
Trees are rarely thin...they are spreading and fat...it would overhang your drive and paths.
Suggest you read this for ideas.
https://www.gardenersworld.com/how-to/solve-problems/how-to-deter-cats-from-your-garden/
Or Taxus baccata aureomarginata....Pic 1.
Can be pruned if it gets to big.
I would lay holly trimmings under it.
Cats hate anything prickly.
I also have a currently very brown fern that is supposed to be evergreen, planted in an extremely wet area specifically because they can cope with that. It's unrelated to my original post, but I am a bit baffled by it...
I also understand about the water scarecrows- I have to stop using them in October, and if I forget, that's more money....
I'd agree with those cotoneasters that @Loxley mentions - they're quite popular round here and can be pruned [carefully] to keep them neat, but the path is a consideration, and if it's blocked people will tend to walk anywhere as it's all hard standing. Another alternative is just a nice shrub- there are plenty of good ones to choose from, and many are very easy. Viburnums for example, or an Ilex [holly] Exochorda, Deutzia, Osmanthus, Cornus, or even a spring flowering Spirea with spring bulbs underneath. The soil would still need improved first.
You could look at raised beds- decent sized, purpose built ones. Then it would be easier to protect planting, and you wouldn't need anything too large in it. Some seasonal colour from bulbs in spring, and some long lasting perennials and a few small evergreens. The drawback of that is they need filled with decent soil, so that's an extra expense.
I live in west central Scotland - not where that photo is...