Light bulbs and Eco/Greenness?

I needed to replace a floor standing lamp as one of the the LED bulbs had packed up in the neat little one we got from Lidl about five years ago, when I bought it I realised that the LED units weren't replaceable but hoped that it would last a good few years anyhow, it has been a good little lamp just giving enough light to read by when it isn't dark enough to have the main lights on. The new lamp that we bought has three adjustable lamps which use 40 watt incandescent bulbs these bulbs turned out to be too long protruding from the shades and too bright and overpowering so we found some small lower wattage bulbs online, today when they arrived I fitted them in and the effect was much better the bulbs were within the shades and the combination of the three 25 Watt bulbs more subtle than the three 40 Watt ones. When I read the small print on the box I noticed that it read "not suitable for household room illumination", strange I thought what magical powers do these bulbs hold that they can't be used to illuminate a room? A quick search on the internet revealed that this disclaimer is a ploy to fool the European Union as they deem it non-green to burn incandescent bulbs in a household but they can be used in a factory/office/advertising sign/etc. This got me thinking about the eco/greenness of on one hand having household equipment which uses less power but has non-replaceable consumable parts such as bulbs and ones which burn more power but at least when the consumable part needs replacing the whole thing doesn't need to be scrapped.
0
Posts
At present I have a small Glow-worm gas boiler which when it packs up I will be unable to replace and will need a much larger condensing boiler which is deemed more fuel efficient.
The current boiler is 19 years old and still works fine and not expensive to run and is checked once a year.
In the same amount of time my Mum is now on her 3rd condensing boiler each of which has had to be manufactured,fitted,disposal of the old and of course paid for.They generally last about 10 years.When you consider the savings on fuel against the cost of replacement and disposal it all mounts up.
I can't see why having to constantly replace something is deemed better than something that may use a bit more energy over time.In the end I expect you consume more than having one that lasts years!
When we had the mini beast from the east early this year and temps were below 0c for several days the condensate pipe on my condensing boiler froze and the boiler made a terrifying noise each time it tried to fire-up - I could actually see it shaking so much on the wall it was a blur!
The boiler was installed the previous year.
Worcester Bosch couldn't visit for several days so I called my plumber and he suggested disconnecting the condensate pipe and let it flow into a bucket in the loft.
He said to be aware that they can produce around 2-3 litres of condensate per hour. I knew that the condensate was mildly acidic so was careful.
I checked every couple of hours but there were only a few drips in the bucket.
After 4 days, there was about 5 litres of condensate in the bucket - a very far cry from the predicted 2-3 litres per hour.
So I done some researching and came across this atricle that describes why condensng boilers are a myth -
https://www.theheatinghub.co.uk/why-our-condensing-boilers-do-not-condense
Billericay - Essex
Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit.
Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.