Thanks for the reply George. I had seen that site but it still doesn't say if the term Azalea is a taxonomy class. I don't think so, I believe it's just a common name for some Rhodos but I want to be sure for something I'm writing. Could you (or anyone) clarify this please.
I think that's the general view - as you say @Silver surfer. All azaleas are rhodos, but not the other way round. It's the simplest way of thinking about it.
When it gets too complex, there's a danger of one's head exploding....
It's a place where beautiful isn't enough of a word....
I live in west central Scotland - not where that photo is...
Posts
I thought I had it sussed.
All Azaleas are Rhododendrons...but not all Rhododendrons are Azaleas.
Rhododendrons had 10 stamen
Those called Azalea have 5 stamen
But at a talk last month by Rhodo expert Richard Milne, apparently this is even wrong.
So it gets very technical...above my pay grade.
With DNA analysis, even shrubs like Menziezia are now reclassified under Rhododendron menziesii. Grr.
Just call them ALL Rhododendrons and you will be accurate.
When it gets too complex, there's a danger of one's head exploding....
I live in west central Scotland - not where that photo is...
I live in west central Scotland - not where that photo is...